I think the intent here is to make sure army vets understand voting for the trumpet is not in their best interest.
I think the intent here is to make sure army vets understand voting for the trumpet is not in their best interest.
Sex and drugs are already very easy to get if you are rich.
Population growth on the other hand is an almost mandatory cornerstone of capitalism. And abortions too, will remain legal for the rich.
On behalf of all Nordic countries, I approve of this.
Did you actually read the content…?
I don’t see a problem, if I was single I’d be happy to try spouse.gov
Incentives of the gov and myself are more aligned than with me and tinder2 VCs.
Khan academy can solve this for you, if you want.
Thanks, this entire post makes more sense now.
Although I gotta ask, at that point is it possible OP also has some issues…?
So what killed him?
On sync at least if you open tall images from the post it will be readable.
Regulate digital purchases.
Amazing. I’m not OP and have no use for this info, but it was fun to learn it still.
I think for most web apps it doesn’t make sense to allow the width to get so wide, except when the content being displayed is a columnar list and even then it’s a pretty marginal benefit.
What I’ve done is limit the max-width to some amount of px/chars and allowed the remaining space be empty, with an exception for when displaying tables. Even with tables, the bigger width is only beneficial if either the contents of the columns are large enough, or there are very many columns to show. The solution in my mind is limiting the column widths to the longest content.
A moist bint lobbing scimitars at people in the middle of jänkhä? Sign me up.
Someone thought me the concept of a legal fiction and I still think about it.
Land ownership, companies, nation states, citizenship: all exist because we agree that it does.
I feel like there’s a simple solution: Government issues free photo IDs to everyone, you need to pay for it if you destroy/lose it while it’s still valid.
The ackshully faces of the two blue shirts are perfect
As someone who comes from a country where we do require photo ID for voting, not requiring one feels absurd, so I asked the same question. Apparently in the US, there is a part of the population that doesn’t normally get photo ID and that part is mostly poor people and minorities and photo ID laws are used as means of disenfranchisement, similar to having the voting days during business days (when many people can’t come to vote) or having voting stations far away in an area with limited public transport options.
Where I live in Finland, the police will actually grant you a temporary photo ID only for voting if you don’t have one, although most people have passports. There are early voting stations in basically every post office for a week and the main voting day is always on a Sunday. No excuse to miss voting.
I’ve only missed one voting during my life, at a time when I was living in another country and there was no consulate in the part of the country I was in. Nowadays there’s also the option of mail-in voting when outside the country, I don’t know if it wasn’t a thing back then or I just didn’t know.
That’s not to say I didn’t want some improvements in our system: I’d like to see ranked choice voting or something similar here, there are some smaller parties I’ve been voting and it seems they seldom have a chance.
I don’t get it, isn’t this a pretty normal way of using media queries. Granted you’re more likely to see the widths defined in px.