![](https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/80ad32da-6e99-4d88-89c2-bd3640a067cb.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Terrible take - and it bothers me how many upvotes this has.
The ~35% blue voters in red states does not “deserve” to have their rights trampled. Nor do voters in blue states “deserve” having their rights crushed because land gets more votes.
Terrible take - and it bothers me how many upvotes this has.
The ~35% blue voters in red states does not “deserve” to have their rights trampled. Nor do voters in blue states “deserve” having their rights crushed because land gets more votes.
I meant it mostly to point out the hypocrisy, but point taken!
I don’t comment often, but FWIW, I appreciate your engagement and takes.
Attack the argument, not the person.
Pretty sure that’s a Rule 1 ban for you there.
It’s a gamble - but one mitigated by looking at review.
I, for one, am very satisfied with my EA purchase of Satisfactory (…pun intended, but heh). Coffee Stain has been absolutely amazing throughout the entire EA Aperiod.
An account that echoes right-wing talking points in most of their posts doesn’t have room to complain about “narrative”
Account that proudly claims to post negative Biden content posts negative Biden content. 🙄
“What does success look like for third-party candidates?” - non-existent until we get past FPTP. Why is this a headline?
The “sensible” nature of everything besides Kelvin is just opinion.
Weird how a rebranded right-wing site organized by a right-wing “news” org would happen to voice an opinion that we should cut back on the 1st.