It expresses to me.
It expresses to me.
Depends on the person you ask.
Are posting this from a locally made computer? 😘
YoUrE ArGuMeNt is WeAk
Turns out they weren’t.
I get going after your ‘enemy,’ but this is even worse than firing randomly into a crowd of Palestinians. They pushed a button not knowing who would die. This is low, even for them.
I can’t even think of a devil’s advocate argument for this.
I’m on the side that he never intended to win at all and he just wanted to get in the spotlight to have some followers to sell gold sprayed products to. Now he’s in way too deep and can’t dig his way out. Tough tits.
Dick maggots are the worst.
Well, that was a trip down memory lane.
You voting for Jill?
Jill won’t do a thing for Gaza. She’s just trying to get votes. She is no different.
No he endorses Jill.
I doubt they would change an article for any reason.
But good luck with your cherries. And good luck getting anything out of Jill. She’s no better than the other parties.
Do you believe the content of the article to be true?
Do you think that information that is a lie and designed to manipulate voters should be allowed?
Yes sharing an article in a public place that is a blatant attempt to manipulate voters does indeed look bad.
The only way it would be gaslighting is if the dems were questioning their own comments.
And they aren’t.
He’s just being a hypocritical lying dick. Not the same thing.
Some people feel you are pushing an article that is clearly designed to manipulate.
I’ve never wanted to be a teacher until now. You know that shit‘s gonna look like Hogwarts