I’ve been recently playing the “so called” sequel to ftl, ftl multiverse. I have gotten the standard and old secret endings, but there are hints of a third even harder to find ending.
I’ve been recently playing the “so called” sequel to ftl, ftl multiverse. I have gotten the standard and old secret endings, but there are hints of a third even harder to find ending.
All I know is that he pointed out in the presidential debate that the Quaran says nothing about hajabs or the proper way of wearing them. Sounds like a good first step.
Splitting the right = left landslide. Splitting the left = right landslide.
Third way: “Hey, if we split the left, the left will win!”
Reminds me of an orville quote I can’t find now - something about firing on all the innocent families of a colony, and the navigator chimes in “yes, and all the single people as well!”
torturing and murdering and raping
So DeSantes, Jan 6th rioters, and Trump?
I just want politicians that:
There was an anti-genocide independent running against Starmer (the new PM) and they came in second. Image if they had won: biggest Labor majority in generations, you are all set to become PM and you loose your seat because you were vague about whether you support or oppose killing innocent women and children.
“A Hacker Stole OpenAI Secrets, Raising Fears That China Could Already Has, Too”
We got half the needed signatures to put it on the 2022 ballot. The ruling was 2 weeks before the signature deadline back in 2022. No way this wasn’t making it.
Think if Twitter for government documents. If the pure text can’t fit in a floppy, nobody’s got the time to read it.
Next up, official woodblock stamps that every employee working on a project has to stamp every official page.
That is what I was saying. I don’t think either will last the full term.
Jan 1st, 2029, neither Trump nor Biden will be president of the United States.
I got the time-zone wrong and missed the first hour. Biden seemed fine to me - what the heck did I miss in the first hour?
Since when was this court consistent with prior rulings?
Remember when SCOTUS threw out laws against gays? Then a bunch of states passed constitutional amendments against gay marriage? Then SCOTUS came and said “Na, none of that means anything, gay marriage for all!”
I feel like I am on the other side of that process this time: SCOTUS throws out Roe, bunch of states do constitutional amendments, SCOTUS rules “Na, none of that means anything, all abortions are now illegal!”
Does it lead to the death of all Hamas? If yes, Hamas will not be on board. If no, Israel will not be on board.
Just look at India’s court system (or the US immigration court system). Backlogs as far as the eye can see! Selective enforcement mixed with laws criminalizing everyone means those in charge can pardon or prosecute whomever they want.
That is until AI gets beyond the toddler with no object permanence stage and suddenly the backlog starts disappearing and all the politicians start retroactively legalizing everything.
Sort of makes me want to write that novel I’ve been putting off where a website pops up with a list of social security numbers + date + GPS + criminal statute code, and it turns out to be a list of the biggest crimes committed by each politician. No one knows where the list came from, but as each politician resigns, new sets of numbers pop up for their replacement.
“The ceasefire must allow us to keep firing”