Für die online Steuerabrechnung in Österreich ist die eID für mich verdammt nützlich. Ich nutze es regelmäßig, mit Android Handy und Linux App.

There’s a “hub” mode where your endpoint inside the network grants access to the whole network like a standard VPN server.

Can just say: nope. No difference for me.

HDGDL, Magnetar!

I didn’t say don’t be loud, I’m saying don’t be a useful idiot for the other side at the same time. Apparently you want to misunderstand the point completely.

Fuck up the DNC libs, establishment democrats, etc! From the inside of possible.

Just don’t play into the hands of the Nazis by using rhetoric that makes their job of “pretending to not be the worst humans possible” easier.

Größtes Problem an der schwarz (hellbraun) grün Sache:

Die Grünen sind als kleiner Partner, welche die hellbraunen wieder für braun abstoßen könnten, nicht sehr durchsetzungskräftig. Sie haben ein wenig was bewegen können, aber wenn hellbraune eins gut können, dann ist es gewissenloses ausnutzen von Schwächen.

Jetzt haben wir hier laut Umfragen über 30% der Wahlberechtigten Leute, die den braunen Scheiß beim nächsten Mal wählen würden, auch wenn der Parteiführer offen alle Masken ablegt.

Besonders arg, da im Österreich extrem hohe Einbürgerungshürden sind und somit ein hoher Anteil (knapp 20%) der Bevölkerung gar nicht erst auf Bundesebene wählen darf.

Wenn die Stimmung weiter so bleibt oder sogar schlimmer wird, dann muss ich mir wohl wieder Gedanken über eine neue Wahlheimat machen. Sicherheit der Familie geht vor.

And who do they draw from? The active base. If the complaints are loud enough, broad enough, from inside the party, that’s when they will have no choice.

“Oh there’s the dnc, can’t do anything, move on” is not a productive way to fight these things.

Use constructive criticism. Criticize the issues. Don’t put false equivalencies first.

No shit, Sherlock. And that’s why you’re helping the fascists with this comparison. You’re working in a two party system, being an idiot about how to actually change shit.

You’re not changing the one party that can be used for change for the better, you’re just whining and making them seek votes elsewhere.

And your own words show exactly what I mean.

There’s a marked difference between lazy fucks who didn’t properly bring it across the finish line and people actively working to make things worse. Correct my believe if I’m wrong: unless it’s a constitutional amendment, laws are fairly easy to overturn still.

And to ‘how many years’… How many years did people have to vote for progressive candidates in the lower levels to change the actual base of the party to where they want it to be? How many years have the voters not used to make it the party they want it to be?

This kinda shit is so fucking often due to progressives wanting things to be a certain way, but not putting in the legwork because “it’s a lost cause anyway”. With the democrats you have a chance to change the party into the progressive direction. Take an example from those maga assholes - it doesn’t take a lot of them to shift the republicans to be even worse.

Criticizing is great, putting it like OP with “they’re the same, democrats just put on a hat” is dishonest and reductionist. This kind of thing actively causes harm and plays into the hands of the party that’s objectively worse for anyone that’s not rich.

It’s not just about the afd, but also about them and the need to destroy them.

I think you misunderstood me?

I’m not saying the article is bad or wrong. I’m taking exception to putting kiddie gloves in headlines.

Think about the people who only read this concisely while browsing headlines. The headline is completely ambiguous and easily reinforces the person’s heels beliefs instead of laying out the important part of where it comes from.

This is before the author and content even comes into play.

Yeah, I did. The author uses political violence as the term throughout. The problem here is not what the author means but that they’re not directly addressing it in clear terms.

You had to guess/ask whether I read the article because the headline makes the source of the political violence ambiguous.

you can bet that an author pointing out a rise on the other side of the political spectrum would not go for muddy terms. This headline seen by a right wing person would just be something they would not click and assume it’s reassuring their fox news world view by a different outlet.

It’s “right-wing terrorism” not political violence as if the whole spectrum is engaged in the same shenanigans.

You’re the popcorn of the rich.

Not like they didn’t add that 32 core power license limit once big epyc CPUs came out…

I don’t care so much about that, more so about the “everything is a subscription” bullshit. Hope they are least keep the offline variant…

Darauf warten, dass meine Tochter endlich bettfertig ist.

A VPN is only as much of a security improvement as the service behind it. If it gets installed in a shady way, how much trust can you put into the service?