![](https://media.kbin.social/media/e9/15/e91548790805c6c416d8ecab84927481ee82e853b0f5521193abfaf1e337963f.jpg)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/bae905b8-0357-4d8f-aeee-8c3227e76c8c.png)
Food Courts Martial
Food Courts Martial
Are there any physical obstructions between the controller and the antenna? That’d reduce the effective range.
Alright, fair.
Typical tankie response.
I dunno, seems kinda bourgeois? Leftist mostly clean their own toilets. They also want to eliminate class stratification, even for those that had conservative parents.
Asking for a ride
AT THE GAY BAR
GAY BAR
GAY BAR
From the PR comments:
Maintainers MAY merge incorrect patches from other Contributors with the goals of (a) ending fruitless discussions, (b) capturing toxic patches in the historical record, © engaging with the Contributor on improving their patch quality.
I asked around and asked in the C4 specification matrix room.
And the reason is actually simple. If you merge bad code, have a record of proof in git (pull requests aren’t forever it’s only a github/gitlab thing).So the idea is if you merge bad code you have proof in the git record that there is a bad actor. You can always revert the commit again or fix it. And the record can act as a proof in case the community want to get rid of bad actors.
Hmm, that seems like not such a good look from Ernest. According to google translate:
I know, honestly it was on purpose. I noticed that forks sync changes immediately with /kbin. I wanted to check how they deal with this much-announced community-based qualitative code review. Answer: they can’t cope. Quite an obvious bug was accepted in PR and domerged into the main branch :P It now works properly on the rifle ;)
Hopefully everyone can play nice and work together productively.
It looks like they’re still working out what they want their process to be:
https://github.com/MbinOrg/mbin/pull/34
Seems like your concern is addressed there:
Pull Requests require at least one (1) other maintainer approval before the PR gets merged (built-in peer review process).
The mbin fork happened when kbin development was looking a lot less active. In any case, it’s not necessarily bad to have a diversity of approaches. Due to their differing organizational structures, mbin will likely tend to have more features and more rapid development, but also potentially more bugs, while kbin remains more stable.
I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues
As much as I would love to see it, I don’t think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.
What are you on about? Dessalines said “No, that is full of CSAM.” I would like to know how they came to that conclusion.
or do the .ml admins have a more broad definition of csam?
Their definition seems to be “I don’t like anime”.
OP is lying through their teeth, nothing was found.
Literally any evidence at all beyond “dessalines said so” would be a good start. Hell, even dessalines specifically describing what he saw would be great.
I don’t know whether it qualifies as very strict, but their content policy does prohibit it:
Do not submit content depicting a child (both real and virtual) engaged or involved in explicit sexual activities. A child is defined as a person who is under 18 years old; or a person, regardless of age, who is presented, depicted or portrayed as under 18 years old.
I’m not aware of any enforcement issues, though I only follow their animemes, anime_irl, and meta communities. And of course, dessalines didn’t cite anything specific, just said “No, that is full of CSAM” and locked the thread.
Domain blocking isn’t instance blocking. It’s for if you don’t want to see posts that link to, for example, imgur.com. It’s also broken and will just hide random posts from you.
You’re posting to /c/foss, not /c/freeofchargeandthecodeisavailableforinspection.
You’re mixing up cranks and bigots. Bigots tend to get banned because they’re harmful. Cranks tend to exclude themselves on principle.
The term “crank” is usually used as a pejorative, but cranks can sometimes be beneficial. Richard Stallman is the prototypical example of a Free Software crank. Definitely annoying, but also definitely a net benefit to all of us.
Fellas, is it woke for YouTube to funnel viewers towards pro-fascist videos?