Is it?
Are you saying you would support bad people under the right circumstances?
Is it?
Are you saying you would support bad people under the right circumstances?
It’s your idea.
All I did is assume all good people agree with you.
Why is Epstein’s still up?
Do they know something?
Do you think they’d stop being bad people if they couldn’t make an honest living? Would it be better or worse if they were on the street? Do you think they might resort to criminality also?
Do you feel better knowing they aren’t getting your money? Even at the cost of them ever doing anything good for anyone?
Is it harm reduction if all the bad people couldn’t make an honest living? Would it be better or worse if they were living on the street? Do you think they might resort to criminality also?
I’m sure a few bad people make a living maintaining it, and all the roads you depend on everyday.
Bad people are everywhere, doing all sorts of jobs you appreciate.
It sounds like you’re arguing that bad people shouldn’t be paid to anything good.
It’ll be easer when you point out they don’t have adds.
That makes sense if you believe Biden is the only one who can beat Trump.
The all the polls say he won’t.
But even if Biden is the chosen one and beats Trump, he can’t run in 2028 while Trump surely will. What then? Biden was our only hope, and he’s not an option anymore.
No. This idea of Biden or bust is wrong. I’m sure lots of people could beat Trump. They’d just do it by embracing progressive populism against conservative populism. But the Democratic elite are very much against that.
That’s because, Progressive populism is very much against the ownership class, which both parties depend on. Conservative populism on the other hand, is largely a tool of the ownership class.
65million was the number I learned as a kid born in 1980.
Sometimes terrible people can do good things.
Those good things should be supported.
Judge a project on it own merits.
People still use the Autobahn.
Our comments right here on the Fediverse, are a good example.
Lemmy, Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, and numerous others, all use the same open communication standard; Offering very different services and experiences.
Collabra seems close. They do use ODF. And you can host you’re own server.
But they don’t seem to use E2EE. And the collaborative aspect doesn’t apear to be an open standard you can use with different software packages.
Is there an open standard for encrypted asynchronous colabreative document creation and editing?
Both can be true.
In fact the former could even be caused by the latter.
Small quantities of BVO are used legally in some citrus-flavored drinks in the United States to keep the flavor evenly distributed.
No, you’ll just have to shake it before drinking.
Number 1 has issues.
Yes wage growth in 2023 was higher than inflation by a margin of 1.3%. That fails to take into account the 7% and 6.5% inflation of '21 and '22. So people are still way behind in recent years.
Also, while by income rates, “Gen Z are now wealthier than any previous generation.” That doesn’t include the drastic increase in housing costs. So while they do have more money, more still have to live with their parents, and delay starting their own separate life, than previous generations. Even that extra money isn’t enough.
Ah! I didn’t realize that. Then it might derail that conviction.
Thought it would still be a big lift to determine it was an official act as POTUS.
Yes I know that’s what they’re talking about. And this SCOTUS ruling doesn’t effect that case at all.
This case was brought to SCOTUS by Trumps Jan6 lawers. It only matters to things done while in office.
The bribery case, the falsified documents case, aren’t at all effected by this ruling.
I’m fully aware, and disagree.
Someone else called it a Slippery Slope. That’s closer, but still not quite right.
It’s actually Reductio ad Absurdum.
Which is a useful thought exorcise when analyzing many ideas.