RN, Biden is still the best odds at beating Trump by the sheer fact that he’s the incumbent. Why do you think all of the rightmost Dems and the Russian shills are hopping aboard the replacement train? Because they want Trump to win.

This comment brought to you by the dysentery gang.

Based Iron Front.

Just because he’s human a man would like a little bite to eat/he won’t get full on empty talk that gives not bread or meat.

So left-two-three and left-two-three to the work that we must do/march on with us in the Iron Front and we will stand with you.

Just because he’s human he doesn’t want a boot upon his neck/he needs no servants under him nor masters overhead.

So left-two-three and left-two-three to the work that we must do/march on with us in the Iron Front and we will stand with you.

Just because he’s a worker his job is all his own/ The Liberation of the working class is a job for the workers alone!

So left-two-three and left-two-three to the work that we must do/march on in the Workers’ United Front, for you are a worker too.

If girls are allowed to read, then they might be able to figure out how terribly they’re treated. We obviously can’t have that.

Fascism is as fascism does.

This looks like it’d get contaminated right quick, take a lot to set up, and be damaged extremely easily. My recommendation would be to collect water from a nearby source and run it through a filter that lasts longer, it’s more reliable, and you get more water out of it.

Filter options include charcoal/sand, wood, and vines. Charcoal and sand filters need a large vessel and a cloth bottom, and won’t get rid of microorganisms. The advantage is that you can hook up a rain collection outflow directly to it, and it’ll last for a while. You make it by first acquiring a vessel, such as a barrel, putting a hole or several in the bottom, and putting a few layers of cloth over the outflow. Then apply alternating layers of charcoal and sand. Charcoal can be made by several methods, if you want a video I recommend Primitive Technology on YouTube.

Wood and vine filters will remove microbes, are able to easily be made in the wild, but will only be effective for as long as the tissues are alive. All you do is find a suitable plant, cut it, shape the cuttings if needed, then stick the end that draws water in the source and the end that releases water in the receptacle. Grape vines and Cyprus wood work best for this.

Reminder that I’m a random person on the internet, and you shouldn’t believe everything you read online.

Wife

With cedar chips.

Terroristic threats is a real crime.

As a joke, that statement is legal.

I am incapable of legally agreeing with this statement.

Accurate; I’m depressed.

My policy when someone throws a big pile of bullshit is to point out one thing, because I don’t want to waste my time.

but of course NATO is partly at fault

Blocked.

You, apparently.

As did everyone. There’s no study showing that the amount of rapes per soldier by the soviets is higher than that of other nations.

Wow, what an incredibly normal and sane thing to say right at the top of your comment history.

Edit: There’s genocide denial and blaming NATO for Ukraine too. I’m not even slightly surprised. This is what we refer to as “entirely predictable.” Get some fucking help and exit your information silo. I keep my information ecosystem healthy by talking to people IRL, and I recommend you do the same.

The firmament is just the sky.

Not pictured:

1. Not voting causes fascism to happen faster.

2. Tankies betraying Anarchists instead of fighting fascism.

If I were in Biden’s position, the first thing I’d do would be to [comment cannot legally be completed].

Literally me.

It is my opinion that repeating decimals cannot

Your opinion is incorrect as a question of definition.

I have never disagreed with the math

You had in the previous paragraph.

Is it possible to have a coversation about math without either fully agreeing or calling the other stupid?

Yes, however the problem is that you are speaking on matters that you are clearly ignorant. This isn’t a question of different axioms where we can show clearly how two models are incompatible but resolve that both are correct in their own contexts; this is a case where you are entirely, irredeemably wrong, and are simply refusing to correct yourself. I am an algebraist understanding how two systems differ and compare is my specialty. We know that infinite decimals are capable of representing real numbers because we do so all the time. There. You’re wrong and I’ve shown it via proof by demonstration. QED.

They are just symbols we use to represent abstract concepts; the same way I can inscribe a “1” to represent 3-2={ {} } I can inscribe “.9~” to do the same. The fact that our convention is occasionally confusing is irrelevant to the question; we could have a system whereby each number gets its own unique glyph when it’s used and it’d still be a valid way to communicate the ideas. The level of weirdness you can do and still have a valid notational convention goes so far beyond the meager oddities you’ve been hung up on here. Don’t believe me? Look up lambda calculus.

Any my argument is that 3 ≠ 0.333…

After reading this, I have decided that I am no longer going to provide a formal proof for my other point, because odds are that you wouldn’t understand it and I’m now reasonably confident that anyone who would already understands the fact the proof would’ve supported.

OG-Wan Kenobi.

You’re welcome.