quite hard to remove
It’s the plant equivalent of cockroaches
quite hard to remove
It’s the plant equivalent of cockroaches
This post brought to you by someone who never planted that cursed, evil herb in their garden
Oh yeah because you just know the people that enjoy them despite them being messy and loud are the ones running about in tiny-penis trucks
Why does Rishi always look like his mum knitted him?
Hey, most of us drive about in small, fuel-efficient cars the whole year
Ban our fireworks once you ban your millions of tiny-penis trucks!
Nah op is in the right here, it’s a really reliable indicator of ragebait, tabloid and/or amateur journalism
What’s crazy is someone saying “It’s somewhere you’d bring a baby to without a second thought” about a fucking shopping mall
Obama so lucky he can make a spelling mistake and still get away with it
It’s hot
Am I cool?
Get Einstein here
British English often uses single quotation marks to identify the outermost text of a primary quotation versus double quotation marks for inner, nested quotations.
From wiki
Huh, just shows you how I was taught the British way many years ago, but adopted the American way due to reading so many bloody books!
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité
Traitor or English [Simplified]?
I actually looked this up; wonderbread has 2.5 grams of sugar per 30g slice!
Fuckin hell
The worst offender I could find in France was Harry’s American bread. 1.2 grams of sugar per 40g slice
In Ireland, if bread has more than 2 grams of sugar per 100g, it’s cake and is taxed as such
Yep you’re getting it. That (additional context, or speculation, or opinions) would have to be a separate article, according to the charter. Linking the facts with someone else’s opinion isn’t allowed, but doing a separate opinion piece (clearly labelled) is ok
This article is reporting facts as they are 100% known, as per the charter. There are no known facts that the pedo was murdered or topped himself, due to obfuscation of the information. It’s reported as known, even if that’s a bit sparse. AP and Reuters do the same.
You will also be able to find opinion pieces on the BBC on the same subject, you just can’t mix the two, as is the case in most journalism nowadays
*Labour
I don’t get the “Someone British is talking” bit
We only use the singular ’ to indicate speech within speech -
John said, “I was just speaking to Charlie, and he said ‘It’s not often XKCD gets things wrong’, and I agreed”.
I could be wrong but that’s what I was taught
I said by law because it’s easier than “royal charter” but it amounts to the same
It’s the BBC, not the Guardian. The journalist literally can’t, by law, add “in suspicious circumstances”
Pffft