I mean, have you been to Kelowna? That was my first thought as well.

Is this relevant to the questions I asked in the comment you are responding to?

He expressed an opinion and that you got butthurt over it… Nothing was misreprented.

Can you quote the comment that demonstrates I am being “butthurt”?

Misinformation is presenting a falsehood as fact. This is a basic concept and you have hard distinguishing the two.

Nothing in the article speaks about the class of the victim, assailants, or their parents.

Do you believe it is okay to blame a group of people for a violent attack before knowing it was carried out by that group of people?

Yes next time he should just shove his opinion in his as and never express again so that some online clown don’t get his feels hurt 🤡

It is weird how invested you are in this.

I am sorry to have upset you by pointing out OP is spreading misinformation based on anecdotal evidence and not the content of the article.

Commenter provided ab opinion and provided the context for it…

What’s your problem here?

Some people hold the opinion that all Indigenous people are dangerous criminals. Some of those same people have first hand experience with a criminal who happens to be Indigenous.

Does the context of experience justify the opinion, even though it is not at all based in fact?

Is it problematic to make sweeping claims about an entire group of people and blame them for an incident without the facts to back it up?

Can you elaborate?

I just did.

None of this is my opinion, it’s just how the world works LOL

This may be of some use to you.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/elaborate

Which Government?

I already answered this one as well.

The gov typically need some sort of warrant, and they need approval from the country they’re requesting it from.

United States of America? Canada? North Korea? China? Australia? Saudi Arabia? South Africa? Brazil?

The point is the app was designed for secure communication, specifically from corrupt governments, which is why it is problematic to allow access to user data as long as the individual is breaking a law in that country.

Or to use the example from the top:

So who gets to pick what’s a lawful request and criminal activity? It’s criminal in some states to seek an abortion or help with an abortion, so would they hand out the IPs of those “criminals”? Because depending on who you ask some will tell you they’re basically murderers. And that’s just one example.

None of this is my opinion, it’s just how the world works LOL

Can you elaborate?

Not necessarily, but kinda. The gov typically need some sort of warrant and they need approval from the country they’re requesting it from.

Which Government?

Pardon my ignorance as this is my first time using the internet, but I am pretty sure that every Government on the planet does not use a universal set of laws or procedures for enforcement.

The country in which the perpetrator lives or the crime was committed. First time using the internet?

In your opinion, all companies must disclose the personal information of customers whenever a Government says “This person broke the law”?

“the stress of the job, the long working hours, the traumatic events such as seeing abused people or dead bodies and severe assaults slowly took a toll on my physical and mental health.”

Being an ex-cop in prison is much worse for ones physical and mental health, and I am happy to hear buddy gets to find out first hand instead of getting off light.

Sounds to me like the Liberal Government is prepared for an early election.

The…law?

In which country?

Basing an opinion on anecdotal evidence without all of the facts presented is a dangerous thing to do.

Food for thought.

I missed the part of the article that spoke about the assailants coming from upper class upbringings.

In fact the victim and assailants weren’t named.

Where are you getting your information?

Under the original lane for 100x the cost?

It is not that he doesn’t get it, it is that he doesn’t care.

I honestly don’t see why he would care either because he has no reason to care. No matter what he does, he keeps getting elected. He probably feels more bullet proof than Superman right now, which is likely why he is running his mouth far more than usual.

As long as he is Premier, the same old song and dance is going to keep happening.

They found their way inside around the time Poilievre became party leader.

Watching question period was always a show but now it is a straight up circus and it is irritating as hell to watch the Speaker of the House let these things slide regularly.

I didn’t realize there was a difference between “Hero of the Right” and a raving lunatic. haha

r/Canada is full of bots, not people, just like the rest of Reddit.

c/Canada isn’t much better regarding racists, trolls, conspiracy theorists, hateful bigots, and the like. The biggest difference, outside of the aforementioned bot issue, is which side of the political spectrum exists as a majority in the forum.

Ask on the other side and they will have just as many kind words as you do for them, making you no better.

That’s r/canada for you!

Great discussion.

Keep Reddit drama on Reddit.

I agree with you there. The second hand market is wonderful for finding ridiculous deals on things people just want gone.

The only problem with the second hand market is the effort needed for it. That effort keeps people from considering it a viable option for goods in the same way the effort to find another store made OP B-line to Amazon.