• raptir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not the issue though. There’s a finite amount of money that Spotify pays out based on the amount of subscription fees it is bringing in. That $38 million would be divided up amongst all the other artists if it wasn’t being paid to white noise podcasts.

    • FringeTheory999@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So someone creates an ambient noise track, people enjoy the ambient track, and the person who created the ambient track gets paid. I don’t see the problem.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        White noise it’s not copyrightable. So, anyone can make a copy, including Spotify themselves. They could “pirate” all the white noise podcasts and redirect them to something they own. Problem solved.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you are a Spotify exec, there is a problem.

            If you are an indie musician who sees your payout being reduced because Spotify says they need to pay white noise podcasts, there is a problem.

            If you believe that this is a zero-sum game and Spotify prints money like magic, there is no problem.

            • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              All you’re saying is that different tracks/shows are competing for attention, and white noise is doing well in that competition. You could make the same argument about any genre.

              Country music is taking a portion of the income that white noise could get paid. Therefore remove all country music from sp0tify.