• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I recognize your good faith argument, I don’t believe it fits with the reality of how criminals operate, or the practicality of what most people can afford.

    You can turn your house into a prison/fortress, which is expensive and only protects you when you’re inside with everything locked up. Panic rooms are expensive as fuck, if you weren’t aware.

    And the odds of self-defense are MUCH better than you think. It’s not a ‘one in a million’ shot that your gun helps you- in 90+% of defensive gun uses, the criminal sees the gun and runs away because he’s not there to fight to the death, he’s there to steal things he can get somewhere else from someone else without risk to his life. He wants a helpless victim, not a fight.

    Click this reddit link- it goes to reddit’s /r/ccw (concealed carry weapon) but filtered to show only stories of when /r/CCW members had to use their guns in self-defense.

    Please just go read some of those stories and rethink your ‘one in a million shot’ position.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nice selection bias, as if the many more people it turns out catastrophically for are able to speak their opinions on the matter in contrast.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Fuck what this guy said goes directly against my worldview… maybe there’s nuance to this very layered conundrum?”

        “Nah, double down”

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, pointing out that the denizens of the building jumper survivor’s club might have a skewed view of the survival rate of jumping off buildings. What a double down and rejection of nuance.