• novibe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    What is an eye and the brain if not organic cameras and computers? This is actually an issue in science philosophy.

    There is no material difference between observation through tools and through “the bare senses”. Observation is what matters.

    Observing quantum phenomena changes it. The tool does not matter.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not even “observing” in that sense. It’s just an interaction that forces the waveform to collapse. Basically, if anything requires a result, then it collapses. It doesn’t need to record anything or anything like that. It just needs to be effected by (or apply an effect to) the photons.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually not correct, words in a lab can mean different things from the popular usage. With Theory being the most popular misconception, as so many people believe that it just means I guess, when in reality it is closer to something we can’t test, but if it weren’t true so many other things that we can test couldn’t possibly be true.

      Typically a theory is never proven nor disproven, it is however replaced with a more accurate Theory.

      Inside of a laboratory, observation means something less like you saw it, and something more like you measured it. All the observation changing it proves, is that we don’t have a method of measuring it that will not interact with it. Which is to be expected given that Quantum phenomenon is legitimately so small that even a microscopic bacterium would say it’s tiny.