• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    all the police need to do is join any of the Telegram channels and see the evidence for themselves

    I mean, that doesn’t tell them who any of those people are?

    • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      That’s what subpoenas are for, to request the ip address and other identifying information are for. The documentation of activity in the channel is the evidence shown to a judge that then gets the official legal request.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s what that’s what subpoenas are for

        Did you just not read the part of their comment that I quoted?

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            But your reply makes no sense since the person I was replying to specifically said they didn’t need subpoenas.

            • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              No, they did not say that. Which is why I responded. You really do like to look for inane arguments.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                If your strategy is just to blatantly lie about what was said, despite the fact that it’s there for everyone to see, then I see no reason to continue this bad faith discussion. Bye.

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Stop being eristic dude. Everywhere I go I see those dumbass comments of you. If no one here makes sense to you, then maybe the problem is in front of your monitor. But I’m pretty sure you’re just looking for arguments.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Have you considered not following me around and harassing me? Or maybe just not being wrong all the time?

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Half of them use their real name. Also a lot of them are sharing links to content they’ve posted using their personal FB account or whatever. They don’t even try to have any opsec because they don’t think they’re doing anything wrong.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Half of them use their real name.

        Which would never be admissible as evidence in court. I could make an account right now using your name, would that make you criminally liable for anything that I say?

        Also a lot of them are sharing links to content they’ve posted using their personal FB account or whatever.

        Do you think I couldn’t create a FB account with your name? Do you know how many friend requests I get every day from redundant accounts trying to masquerade as people I’m already friends with?