• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As in “We haven’t cut emissions to zero yet.” We can, and will. It’s a question of whether we do it quickly enough to preserve a civilization-supporting climate.

    • Einar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Likely not. The next years will be hell. Then, after 10 years or so - maybe sooner -, 2024 will be remembered as one of the more pleasant years with still bearable temperatures and comparably few catastrophes. We even still had affordable coffee and olive oil.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      We should probably start with reducing the rate of increase first. Then talk about reducing emissions per year. As for zero emissions, I fail to see how we have a civilization of any sort without some emissions. Maybe that’s the point. Was “Net Zero” a hidden word for collapse all along?

        • hobovision@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a really hopeful reading of that chart. What I see in that chart is that even a year or two of falling emissions could quickly be wiped away. Just look at 2022.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a bit more than that; there are policies in place which make Chinese emissions likely to slowly drop from here on out