• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    A link is just pointing at someone else saying it. What makes someone else a better source?

    • XbSuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Their journalistic integrity. You are no one, therefore your word carries no weight. Link sources, or don’t expect people to believe you.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh boy, calling someone a nobody and whining about integrity in the same breath! Literally everyone is just somebody. Believe them based on evidence rather than your simple minded stylistic impressions. Putting on a lab coat doesn’t add any more credibility than putting on a bath robe.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What makes someone else a better source?

      They have a history of adhering to facts, so they’ve built up a good reputation.

      You can look them up on mediabiasfactcheck.com and other independent fact checkers like Snopes to see how much of a reliable source they are.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh boy here we go.

        The best lies have truths sprinkled around them.

        Snopes got snoped. Snopes is actually terrible. I’m surprised to see their old reputation is still holding out with some people.

        Nobody is a good source. Material needs to stand on it’s own. Everyone has a camera, but only well established sources have high quality photo manipulation.