Since they can only think about themselves, they cannot think of someone taking an action that they didn’t already do

Yes, but I believe e-voting being a bad idea is the common opinion among not just programmers but cybersecurity professionals specifically as well.

I just wanted to do some stats tbh I was getting rusty

👎

…is my free will in danger? 😥

I guess I’ll have no choice but to upgrade to paid will

Indeed I am. Such is the wonder of free will.

:(

People here just want to be outraged and anger about everthing

I find this quite ironic considering your previous posts.

Yeah but it’s less fun

Wait, is that true?

k = killers, i = innocents, p = total population, r = killer ratio

p = k+i

r = k/(k+i) = k/p

If an innocent kills a killer: (+1 killer, -1 innocent) from becoming a killer; -1 killer from killing a killer; -1 innocent net change, so r goes up (bad)

Now that you’re a killer, any time you kill another killer, it’s just -1 killer. r goes down (because the numerator gets smaller faster than the denominator) (good).

This means that the first time you kill someone is always bad, but it gets better if you kill more people. You can offset the net cost of the first kill this way; if r <= 0.5, killing two people will do it. So you’re right that if everyone kills one person, the world will be full of killers. But this also suggests that the best course of action is for one person to go around and kill every killer, and then themselves, leaving the world temporarily killer-free!

Again- nuance. Understand it.

I do, don’t be smug. Come on now.

Anyways, thank you for providing concrete reasoning, maybe you’ll have convinced some more people now.

I think the different sizes are neat. You get to choose how much you want to eat.

Togo and Benin (terribly politically incorrect, we know, but we had to combine them to create enough space for a hazelnut)

lol

This doesn’t make any sense. People don’t know about it, but they already but Chocolonely because they know about it? What?

ONE PERSON

ONE VOTE

No, you haven’t. You’ve repeatedly claimed that experts think pulling out of a 20 year conflict is complicated*, but haven’t provided the slightest insight into how that might be. In fact, you’ve admitted that you don’t know. If you put 1/10th as much effort into researching this instead of just making 20 appeals to authority and saying we can’t hope to understand it, you would know what’s complicated about it.

* and I’m not saying it’s not complicated. But making 20 posts to this effect with no further substance has no value.

Why are you being so aggressive bro it’s a meme community not your local #politics channel

This only works on a societal level if you have a way to prevent people from being evil. Not just laws, but enforcement.

If we cross a line to stop a bad guy are we any better than him

Your analysis is correct but I’m so tired of this line in popular discourse and the media. See also:

ITT: People saying he’s already like this