Remote work is still ‘frustrating and disorienting’ for bosses, economist says—their No. 1 problem with it::Although some bosses have recognized the benefits of workplace flexibility, many are still hesitant to adopt remote work permanently.

  • noisypine@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Companies usually have some metrics they use to determine if employees are meeting their requirements and these same metrics can be used for remote employees. The problem is, they can’t wring you out for extra work. Looking busy at work is important because if you complete all your tasks 100%, management will just give you more work. At home, you can complete your work in 1 hour and then spend the rest of your time for leisure. This terrifies management, because looking over your shoulder and squeezing you for extra work without more pay is the only real value they bring to the company.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I managed a remote team for 5 years. Good managers have no problem leading teams remotely. It is a question of knowing your employees and how best to make the remote environment work for their specific skills and job requirements. People trying to get monitoring software or pushing for RTO are just trying to get butts in seats and not truly managing their people.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Were you part of this team before going remote? What’s your experience in learning more about the people never meet in person

      • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        My company was about 70% remote before I joined, and went to about 90% during covid so I had two people in office when I started and let them go remote about 18 months in.

        We had lots of time together to get to chat and get to know one another. I stressed on camera time for most team calls (other calls were their choice). I also made sure to build in time fore every call to just chat and socialize. I tried to get budget for some team gatherings but we never got it. That would definitely have helped with learning about people personally.

        Remote is definitely different from in person work, and I felt like I had fewer friends around work than I did in person. But I was productive and effective and so was my team. And they were happy. If I could do it again I’d definitely build in more time for regular in person meetings, maybe quarterly or semiannual, but unless I find the perfect gig in town I don’t think I would ask another team to work in person full time. Its not necessary for most white-collar jobs anymore.

  • vih@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    About 25 years ago I was brought in on contract to teach a course on networking to a group of people sent there on a job skills training thing.

    Many of them wanted to be there, some didn’t. And so the first thing I was told was to look for people whose faced looked green: They were inn in front of computers, and this was the Windows '95 days, and they all had Solitaire, and if I saw a green glow it meant someone had zoned out and was playing Solitaire.

    Over the years it turns out a lot of managers takes pretty much that approach to managing employees. Instead of talking to people and paying attention to whether they are productive, they’ve gotten comfortable with looking for superficial signs of whether or not people appear to be productive.

    And the first sign they used to look far was whether or not you were even at your desk typing…

    Of course managers who have spent their career dependent on that as their sign you’re working will freak out when they can’t see you.

    • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, it’d be a shame if they had to do some real work instead of looking over shoulders and being a general nuisance.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was an IT manager for a decade and it was much easier for me to keep my finger on the pulse of remote employees than in-person. It’s not rocket science.

  • Barky@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh nooooooooo, not the bosses!! Won’t someone think of the bosses???

  • TrismegistusMx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Peter Principle. These bosses have been promoted to the point of incompetence, and now they’re stuck alone with their confusion and nobody else to blame.

  • jmd_akbar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would lose my control over my minions… Why don’t you understand?

    Whoops, I meant, my staff can’t be monitored…

    Whoops, I actually meant, I will lose the one place in life where I can actually throw around my power…

    /s

  • korewa@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Actually it’s all about losing company culture and collaboration if we’re not face to face.

    /s

  • Gamingdexter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Considering all my management besides my direct manager is remote, blows my mind that my coworkers and myself need to be in. I work in IT

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was in a job a couple years ago where our Director required us all to be in the office. Yes, in the middle of the pandemic. He and his sycophantic minion (my direct boss) were full time WFH though. Bastards.