• Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My god there are way too many comments in here trying to normalize pedophilia. Disgusting. Pathetic.

    These are people that need serious psychiatric care, not acceptance or to be included in the LGBTQ+ community. There is absolutely nothing to compare between them and any group within the LGBTQ+ community. Nothing.

    Combatting CP is a hard enough task for the poor bastards that have to do it. There does not need to be AI produced images in the mix.

    Lemmy, do better.

    • dsemy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think pedophiles should be treated with compassion, as being a pedophile doesn’t make someone a sexual predator.

      IMO the stigma against pedophiles worsens their mental state and could push them to become sexual predators. This is just a guess though.

      However, I do think “treatment” of pedophilia with generated CP should only be tried after conducting proper research into the actual effectiveness of it (maybe with general sex offenders and regular porn). In the end I think the top priority should be to minimize the amount of pedophiles who are also predators.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sex offenders aren’t allowed to watch porn because the evidence suggests it doesn’t treat the behavior, but encoureges it.

        • Forbo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Having a hard time finding the evidence you mention, got a citation? First few articles I saw were actually advising against blanket pornography bans.

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            For example, Vega and Malamuth (2007) explored the role of pornography in the context of risk factors associated with sexual aggression within a group of male university students. They found that excessive pornography consumption added significantly to the prediction of sexual aggression.

            This review was unable to demonstrate that there was not a relationship between early exposure to pornography and sexual offending. It also consistently appears that men who sexually offend report less exposure to pornography and that exposure to pornography does not result in more harm being caused to the victim. The review suggests that there is not a consistent relationship between exposure to pornography and offending shortly after exposure.

            So a recent meta analysis has not found anything conclusive one way or the other. Operant conditioning does suggest a correlation (watching naked children while masturbating reinforces the neural pathways that link sexual arousal to kids).

            I did time for a drug offense and met a lot of sexual offenders. In my state, they’re not allowed to watch porn if they’re on parole.

            Anyway, the jury is out on if there is enough correlation between the two. But there’s definitely not evidence that I could find that letting pedophiles masterbate to pictures of children is helpful, as you suggest. Rather those images are simulated or not.

            https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178918302404

            • Forbo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t suggest shit, so please don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks for the citations though.

              • treefrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                However, I do think “treatment” of pedophilia with generated CP should only be tried after conducting proper research into the actual effectiveness of it (maybe with general sex offenders and regular porn).

                Okay. Well this research has been tried with general sex offenders and it’s inconclusive rather it’s helpful or harmful.

                Sorry for reading your post suggestion that we try treating pedophiles with AI generated CP as a suggestion that CP would be helpful for pedophiles.

    • Forbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t have any nuanced discussion here! Glad to see people such as yourself engaging in reductionism and shutting down thinking, because all interactions online have to be boiled down to five words TL;DR pithy sound bites.

      Leave the shit on Twitter, we can do better here.

      • datavoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually typed out a more lengthy response to someone here already, read more responses/viewed the vote counts, and then wrote this top level comment pointing out how backwards this community’s views are. No one is directly supporting assaulting children, but as I wrote elsewhere: “why do we value the sexual gratification of pedos higher than the potential safety of children?”

        • MikuNPC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Who the heck is proposing we value that? Everyone is saying we value the safety of real children which may entail keeping artificial CP legal.

          Also it’s a victimless crime so punishments dealt out are criticized heavily, and for good reason.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m very conflicted on this one.

    Child porn one of those things that won’t go away if you prohibit it, like alcohol. It’ll just go underground and cause harm to real children.

    AI child pornography images, as disturbing as they might be, would serve a “need”, if you will, while not actually harming children. Since child pornography doesn’t appear to be one of those “try it and you’ll get addicted” things, I’m genuinely wondering if this would actually reduce the harm caused to real children. If so, I think it should be legal.

    • MrSqueezles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard an anonymous interview with someone who was sickened by their own attraction to children. Hearing that person speak changed my perspective. This person had already decided never to marry or have kids and chose a career to that same end, low likelihood that kids would be around. Clearly, since the alternative was giving up on love and family forever, the attraction wasn’t a choice. Child porn that wasn’t made with children, comics I guess, was used to fantasize to prevent carrying through on those desires in real life.

      I don’t get it, why anyone would be attracted to kids. It’s gross and hurtful and stupid. If people suffering from this problem have an outlet, though, maybe fewer kids will be hurt.

    • clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Normalisation in culture has effects on how people behave in the real world. Look at Japan’s sexualization of women and minors, and how they have huge problems with sexual assault. It’s not about whether or not real children are getting hurt, it’s about whether it’s morally right or wrong. And as a society, we’ve decided that CP is very wrong as a moral concept.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s the thing though, being too paranoid about normalization also makes the problem worse, because the truth is that these are people with severe mental problems, who in all likelihood want to seek professional help in most cases.

        The problem is the subject is SO taboo that even a lot of mental health professionals will chase them off like rabid animals when the solution is developing an understanding that can lead to a clinical treatment plan for these cases.

        Doing that will also help the CSAM problem too since getting people out of the alleyways and into professional help will shrink the market significantly, both immediately and overtime, reducing the amount of content that gets made, and as a result, the amount of children victimized to make that content.

        The key factor remains, we have to stop treating these people like inhuman monsters that deserve death and far worse whenever they’re found. They’re sick in the head souls who need robust mental health care and thought management strategies.