• Echo71Niner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s quite audacious for China to intercept us during our flyby mission near the airspace of one of their allies. If the situation were reversed, and the Chinese were conducting a flyby along the coast of Alaska, we would unquestionably support their right to do so and refrain from any intervention.

    • steltek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re misrepresenting what happened and the documented differences in how China behaves vs other countries.

      It’s hard to overstate how dangerous flying within 5 meters of another jet is.

      Russia frequently tests US readiness by flying towards North American airspace yet you don’t hear about F-22 pilots colliding with other planes. But there’s a long history of Chinese pilots absolutely fucking it up, resulting in death and damage.

    • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Canada is flying missions for the UN which Chia is a part of. China should not be attempting to interfere with these missions as the purpose is to make sure the DPRK are in fact honoring their agreements.

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    How dare China go intercept us while we are doing a fly by right on the edge of one of their allies air space. If the Chinese were doing a fly by on the coast of Alaska we would totally defend their right to do so and not take any action!

    • BenderOver@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      From what I read (and saw on video), the issue is that the Chinese jet got within 10 meters of the plane being intercepted… Which is reckless as hell.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s a Security Council resolution, very different than a broader UN operation.

        The resolution itself does not provide for military force to be used for enforcement. Canada was acting against this.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Would you like to refresh my memory on which countries have permanent veto power on the Security Council?

          Would you also like to remind me which countries on the Security Council voted to impose sanctions on North Korea?

          I’ll wait.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Does not grant the use of military force. That doesn’t mean that surveillance planes are banned, ffs.

              You’re really going out of your way to defend what is meaningless and petty nationalist dickwaving for domestic Chinese media.